Elawyers Elawyers

HANDAL v. DEEB, 09-23412-CIV-HUCK/O'SULLIVAN. (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. Florida Number: infdco20130627b62 Visitors: 22
Filed: Jun. 26, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 26, 2013
Summary: ORDER JOHN J. O'SULLIVAN, District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Responses to Discovery in Aid of Execution and for Sanctions (DE # 137, 12/10/13). Having reviewed the applicable filings and law, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Responses to Discovery in Aid of Execution and for Sanctions (DE # 137, 12/10/13) os DENIED as untimely. RULE 26.1(h) of the Local Rules for the Southern District of Florida provides: (h)
More

ORDER

JOHN J. O'SULLIVAN, District Judge.

THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Responses to Discovery in Aid of Execution and for Sanctions (DE # 137, 12/10/13). Having reviewed the applicable filings and law, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Responses to Discovery in Aid of Execution and for Sanctions (DE # 137, 12/10/13) os DENIED as untimely. RULE 26.1(h) of the Local Rules for the Southern District of Florida provides:

(h) Discovery Motions. (1) Time for Filing. All motions related to discovery, including but not limited to motions to compel discovery and motions for protective order, shall be filed within thirty (30) days of the occurrence of grounds for the motion. Failure to file a discovery motion within thirty (30) days, absent a showing of reasonable cause for a later filing, may constitute a waiver of the relief sought.

The Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Responses to Discovery in Aid of Execution and for Sanctions (DE # 137, 12/10/13) failed to comply with local rule 26.1(h) for the Southern District of Florida because it was not filed within the requisite 30 days.

DONE AND ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer