Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. RAMOS, 5:13-cr-22-RS. (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. Florida Number: infdco20130710866 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jul. 03, 2013
Latest Update: Jul. 03, 2013
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION LARRY A. BODIFORD, Magistrate Judge. Defendant proposed to enter a guilty plea to Counts One and Two of this indictment. The district judge referred this matter to me for purposes of hearing Defendant's proposed change of plea pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 11 and to enter a report and recommendation as to whether to accept the change of plea. All parties consented to this procedure, and the written consent has been entered. After hearing, it is found that: 1. Defendant
More

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

LARRY A. BODIFORD, Magistrate Judge.

Defendant proposed to enter a guilty plea to Counts One and Two of this indictment. The district judge referred this matter to me for purposes of hearing Defendant's proposed change of plea pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 11 and to enter a report and recommendation as to whether to accept the change of plea. All parties consented to this procedure, and the written consent has been entered. After hearing, it is found that:

1. Defendant understands the nature of the charge or charges as to which the plea is offered.

2. Defendant understands the right to trial by jury, to persist in a plea of not guilty, to assistance of counsel at trial, and to confront and cross examine adverse witnesses, and understands the right against compelled self-incrimination.

3. Defendant understands the maximum possible sentence if the guilty plea is accepted, including the effect of a supervised release term, understands that the sentencing guidelines are advisory, and understands that the court has discretion to depart from those guidelines and sentence up to the statutory maximum sentence.

4. The plea of guilty by the Defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made, and is not the result of force or threats, or of promises except for promises contained in the written plea agreement between the parties.

5. Defendant is competent to plead guilty.

6. Defendant understands that answers given by the Defendant during the plea colloquy, which were under oath, may be later used against the Defendant in prosecution for perjury or false statement.

7. There is a factual basis for Defendant's guilty plea.

8. There is a plea agreement which should be accepted by the court. Defendant understands the terms of the plea agreement.

9. Defendant has voluntarily consented to go forward with this plea of guilty before me. Defendant knowingly and voluntarily has waived the ten day period for filing objections to this report and recommendation, and agrees that written objections, if any, must be filed within twenty-four hours from receipt of a copy of this report and recommendation. The United States also consents to this procedure, including the shorter period for objections.

Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED that the court ACCEPT the plea agreement and defendant's plea of guilty.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer