Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

CRENSHAW v. CITY OF DEFUNIAK SPRINGS, 3:13cv50/MCR/EMT. (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. Florida Number: infdco20130730d55 Visitors: 3
Filed: Jul. 29, 2013
Latest Update: Jul. 29, 2013
Summary: AMENDED ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief District Judge. This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated July 8, 2013. (Doc. 63). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any ob
More

AMENDED ORDER

M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief District Judge.

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated July 8, 2013. (Doc. 63). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Additionally, Plaintiffs' "Amended Motion for Default Judgement [sic]" (doc. 69) does not correct the legal insufficiencies identified by the magistrate judge in the Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Plaintiffs' "Motion for Default Judgement [sic]" and "Amended Motion for Default Judgment [sic]" (docs. 61, 69) are DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer