Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. BRADFORD, 13-14047-CR-MARTINEZ/LYNCH(s)(s)(s). (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. Florida Number: infdco20140319f99 Visitors: 6
Filed: Mar. 17, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 17, 2014
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION JOSE MARTINEZ, District Judge. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the Order of Reference from the District Court to conduct a Change of Plea before a Magistrate Judge. THE MATTER was referred to Magistrate Judge Frank J. Lynch Jr, on January 27, 2014. A Report and Recommendation was filed on February 4, 2014, (D.E. #228), recommending that the Defendant's plea of guilty be accepted. During the Change of Plea hearing, the Magistrate J
More

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

JOSE MARTINEZ, District Judge.

THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the Order of Reference from the District Court to conduct a Change of Plea before a Magistrate Judge.

THE MATTER was referred to Magistrate Judge Frank J. Lynch Jr, on January 27, 2014. A Report and Recommendation was filed on February 4, 2014, (D.E. #228), recommending that the Defendant's plea of guilty be accepted. During the Change of Plea hearing, the Magistrate Judge questioned the Defendant regarding his waiver of appeal in which the Defendant acknowledged on the record that he was waiving or giving up all rights to appeal any sentence imposed by the District Court in this case except under the limited circumstances contained within the appeal waiver provision from the Plea Agreement.

The parties were afforded the opportunity to file objections to the Report and Recommendation, however none were filed. The Court has reviewed the entire file and record and notes that no objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court affirms and adopts the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, it is hereby:

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that

The Report and Recommendation (D.E. #228) of United States Magistrate Judge Frank J. Lynch Jr., is hereby AFFIRMED and ADOPTED in its entirety.

The Defendant is adjudged guilty to Count One, Four, Five, Six, Seven, and Nine of the Third Superseding Indictment, which charges the Defendant in Count One: conspiracy to interfere with commerce by threats or violence (robbery), in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1951(a); in Count Four with interfering with commerce by threats or violence (robbery), in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1951(a) and 2; in Count Five with using, carrying, and possessing a firearm in furtherance of a crime of violence (brandished), in violation of Title 18, United States Code 924(c)(1)(A)(ii) and 2; in Count Six with interfering with commerce by threats or violence (robbery), in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1951(a) and 2; in Count Seven with using, carrying, and possessing a firearm in furtherance of a crime of violence (brandished), in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 924(c)(1)(A)(ii) and 2; and in Count Nine with felon in possession of firearm, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 922(g)(1) and 2.

DONE AND ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer