U.S. v. BISKE, 3:03cr5/LAC/CJK (2014)
Court: District Court, N.D. Florida
Number: infdco20140404951
Visitors: 11
Filed: Mar. 21, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 21, 2014
Summary: ORDER LACEY A. COLLIER, District Judge. This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated February 5, 2014 (doc. 64). Defendant has been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be a
Summary: ORDER LACEY A. COLLIER, District Judge. This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated February 5, 2014 (doc. 64). Defendant has been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be ad..
More
ORDER
LACEY A. COLLIER, District Judge.
This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated February 5, 2014 (doc. 64). Defendant has been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1. Defendant's motion to vacate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (doc. 63) is SUMMARILY DISMISSED, as this court lacks jurisdiction to consider a successive motion absent authorization from the Eleventh Circuit.
2. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
