U.S. v. BEALL, 5:10-cr-13-RS-EMT. (2014)
Court: District Court, N.D. Florida
Number: infdco20140423989
Visitors: 18
Filed: Apr. 22, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 22, 2014
Summary: ORDER RICHARD SMOAK, District Judge. Before me are the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 44) and Defendant's Objections (Doc. 45). The objections have been considered de novo. IT IS ORDERED: 1. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is approved and incorporated in this Order. 2. The motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence (Doc. 32) is DENIED. 3. The certificate of appealability is DENIED because defendant did not make a substantial showing of the
Summary: ORDER RICHARD SMOAK, District Judge. Before me are the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 44) and Defendant's Objections (Doc. 45). The objections have been considered de novo. IT IS ORDERED: 1. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is approved and incorporated in this Order. 2. The motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence (Doc. 32) is DENIED. 3. The certificate of appealability is DENIED because defendant did not make a substantial showing of the ..
More
ORDER
RICHARD SMOAK, District Judge.
Before me are the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 44) and Defendant's Objections (Doc. 45). The objections have been considered de novo.
IT IS ORDERED:
1. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is approved and incorporated in this Order.
2. The motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence (Doc. 32) is DENIED.
3. The certificate of appealability is DENIED because defendant did not make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.
Source: Leagle
