HARTLEY v. COMERFORD, 3:13cv488/MCR/EMT. (2014)
Court: District Court, N.D. Florida
Number: infdco20140609922
Visitors: 7
Filed: Jun. 06, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 06, 2014
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief District Judge. This cause comes on for consideration upon the Chief Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated May 8, 2014 (doc. 28). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). The Court has reviewed the record and no timely objections have been filed. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, the Court fi
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief District Judge. This cause comes on for consideration upon the Chief Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated May 8, 2014 (doc. 28). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). The Court has reviewed the record and no timely objections have been filed. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, the Court fin..
More
ORDER
M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief District Judge.
This cause comes on for consideration upon the Chief Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated May 8, 2014 (doc. 28). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). The Court has reviewed the record and no timely objections have been filed.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that it is due to be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1. The Chief Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.
2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to comply with an Order of the Court.
Source: Leagle
