U.S. v. SANTIAGO, 5:08-cr-28-RS (2014)
Court: District Court, N.D. Florida
Number: infdco20140716976
Visitors: 15
Filed: Jul. 15, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 15, 2014
Summary: ORDER RICHARD SMOAK, District Judge. Before me is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 98). No objections were filed. I have reviewed the report and recommendation de novo. IT IS ORDERED: 1. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is approved and incorporated in this Order. 2. The Defendant's motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255 (Doc. 97) is SUMMARILY DISMISSED, as this court lacks jurisdiction to consider a successiv
Summary: ORDER RICHARD SMOAK, District Judge. Before me is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 98). No objections were filed. I have reviewed the report and recommendation de novo. IT IS ORDERED: 1. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is approved and incorporated in this Order. 2. The Defendant's motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255 (Doc. 97) is SUMMARILY DISMISSED, as this court lacks jurisdiction to consider a successive..
More
ORDER
RICHARD SMOAK, District Judge.
Before me is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 98). No objections were filed. I have reviewed the report and recommendation de novo.
IT IS ORDERED:
1. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is approved and incorporated in this Order.
2. The Defendant's motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. 97) is SUMMARILY DISMISSED, as this court lacks jurisdiction to consider a successive motion absent authorization from the Eleventh Circuit.
4. The certificate of appealability is DENIED because Petitioner did not make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.
3. The clerk is directed to close the file.
ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
