TAYLOR v. CREWS, 5:13cv243/LAC/EMT. (2014)
Court: District Court, N.D. Florida
Number: infdco20140722764
Visitors: 19
Filed: Jul. 21, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 21, 2014
Summary: ORDER LACEY A. COLLIER, Senior District Judge. This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated June 26, 2014 (doc. 24). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of objections filed. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the timely filed o
Summary: ORDER LACEY A. COLLIER, Senior District Judge. This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated June 26, 2014 (doc. 24). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of objections filed. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the timely filed ob..
More
ORDER
LACEY A. COLLIER, Senior District Judge.
This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated June 26, 2014 (doc. 24). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of objections filed.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the timely filed objections thereto, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.
2. Respondent's motion to dismiss (doc. 17) is GRANTED.
3. Petitioner's amended habeas petition (doc. 4) is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b).
4. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.
DONE and ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
