U.S. v. MITCHELL, 3:03cr57/LC/CJK (2014)
Court: District Court, N.D. Florida
Number: infdco20140729a18
Visitors: 10
Filed: Jul. 28, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 28, 2014
Summary: ORDER LACEY A. COLLIER, Senior District Judge. This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated July 7, 2014 (doc. 81). Defendant has been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of the timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the objections the
Summary: ORDER LACEY A. COLLIER, Senior District Judge. This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated July 7, 2014 (doc. 81). Defendant has been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of the timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the objections ther..
More
ORDER
LACEY A. COLLIER, Senior District Judge.
This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated July 7, 2014 (doc. 81). Defendant has been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of the timely filed objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1. The motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence (doc. 80) is summarily DENIED and DISMISSED.
2. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
