U.S. v. BRIDGEWATER, 3:07cr58/MCR/CJK (2014)
Court: District Court, N.D. Florida
Number: infdco20140903c34
Visitors: 13
Filed: Sep. 02, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 02, 2014
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief District Judge. This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated April 24, 2014. (Doc. 336). Defendant has been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief District Judge. This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated April 24, 2014. (Doc. 336). Defendant has been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections t..
More
ORDER
M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief District Judge.
This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated April 24, 2014. (Doc. 336). Defendant has been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1. Defendant's motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence (doc. 305) is DENIED.
2. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.
DONE AND ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
