Filed: Oct. 29, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 29, 2014
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY MARCIA G. COOKE, District Judge. THIS MATTER was referred to the Honorable Patrick A. White, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B), Rules 8 and 10 of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Cases in the United States District Courts, and Administrative Order 2003-19 of this Court, for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on an
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY MARCIA G. COOKE, District Judge. THIS MATTER was referred to the Honorable Patrick A. White, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B), Rules 8 and 10 of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Cases in the United States District Courts, and Administrative Order 2003-19 of this Court, for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on any..
More
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY
MARCIA G. COOKE, District Judge.
THIS MATTER was referred to the Honorable Patrick A. White, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B), Rules 8 and 10 of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Cases in the United States District Courts, and Administrative Order 2003-19 of this Court, for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters, ECF No. 3. On March 14, 2014, Judge White issued a Report of Magistrate Judge, ECF No. 9, recommending: (i) that Charles Wooten's Motion to Vacate Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 225, ECF No. 1, be dismissed because he failed to bring it within the one-year limitations period prescribed by statute; (ii) that a certificate of appealability be denied; (iii) that the case be closed.
On April 10, 2014, Movant Charles Wooten objected to the Report of Magistrate Judge, ECF No. 10. However, Wooten failed to demonstrate new facts or establish that he is entitled to equitable tolling of the one-year limitations period. After consideration of Judge White's Report and Recommendation, Wooten's objections, and a de novo review of the record, I find Judge White's Report and Recommendation clear, cogent, and compelling.
It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Judge White's Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 9, with respect to the merits of the case is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED. Accordingly, the Motion to Vacate Sentence, ECF No. 1, is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this case.
It is FURTHER ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Petitioner has not demonstrated that "jurists of reason could disagree with the district court's resolution of his constitutional claims or that jurists could conclude the issues presented are adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further." Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 326 (2003); accord Lott v. Attorney Gen., Fla., 594 F.3d 1296, 1301 (11th Cir. 2010) (explaining that a "petitioner need not show he will ultimately succeed on appeal" in order to warrant a certificate of appealability). Accordingly, this Court DENIES a Certificate of Appealability in this case.
DONE and ORDERED.
