FRANK J. LYNCH, Jr., Magistrate Judge.
1. The Defendant appeared before this Court on October 22, 2014, for a preliminary hearing and final evidentiary hearing in respect to a Petition Alleging Violation of Supervised Release alleging the following violation:17211721374656520
2. After consultation with his attorney, the Defendant announced to this Court that he wished to admit the sole violation of the Petition, Violation Number 1, as set forth in the Petition. This Court questioned the Defendant on the record and made certain that he understood his rights in regards to an evidentiary hearing in respect to the alleged violation. Further, the Defendant acknowledged that he understood his rights in that regard and further understands that all that will remain will be for the District Court to conduct a sentencing hearing for final disposition in this matter.
3. The possible maximum penalties which the Defendant was facing were read into the record by the government and the Defendant stated that he understood those penalties. The government offered Government's Exhibit No. 1 into evidence which is the Judgment and Conviction from the County Court in and for Saint Lucie County, Florida, which reflects the Defendant pled nolo contendere to the charges of disorderly intoxication and resisting an officer without violence. The exhibit reflects that he received sixty (60) days county jail with credit for time served on the disorderly intoxication charge and one hundred fifty (150) days in the county jail on resisting officer without violence concurrent with credit for time served. There being no objection from the Defendant, this exhibit was admitted into evidence at the change of plea hearing and this Court will reference it in its Detention Order as well.
The parties shall have fourteen (14) days from the date of this Report and Recommendation within which to file objections, if any, with the Honorable K. Michael Moore, the United States District Judge assigned to this case. Pursuant to Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 59(b)(2), failure to file objections timely waives a party's right to review and bars the parties from attacking on appeal any legal rulings and factual findings contained herein.