Filed: Dec. 29, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 29, 2014
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief District Judge. This cause comes on for consideration upon the Chief Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated July 18, 2014 (doc. 56). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). The Court has made a de novo determination of the timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and t
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief District Judge. This cause comes on for consideration upon the Chief Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated July 18, 2014 (doc. 56). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). The Court has made a de novo determination of the timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and th..
More
ORDER
M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief District Judge.
This cause comes on for consideration upon the Chief Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated July 18, 2014 (doc. 56). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). The Court has made a de novo determination of the timely filed objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the objections thereto timely filed, the Court has determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1. The Chief Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.
2. Petitioner's Rule 60(b) motion for relief from judgment (doc. 48) is DENIED.
3. Petitioner's Motion to Stay Proceeding and Expand Record (doc. 62), Amended Leave of Court and Expand Record (doc. 63), and Motion for Appointment of Counsel (doc. 64) are DENIED.
4. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.
DONE and ORDERED.
