Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION v. SPROUSE, 3:14cv527/MCR/CJK. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. Florida Number: infdco20150213894 Visitors: 11
Filed: Jan. 13, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 13, 2015
Summary: ORDER and REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CHARLES J. KAHN, Jr., Magistrate Judge. On October 10, 2014, the undersigned entered an order denying defendant's in forma pauperis motion and allowing defendant thirty days in which to submit the filing fee for the removal of this action. See doc. 5. The undersigned advised defendant that, in the event he failed to pay the filing fee within the time allowed, the undersigned could recommend that the matter be dismissed for failure to comply with an order
More

ORDER and REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CHARLES J. KAHN, Jr., Magistrate Judge.

On October 10, 2014, the undersigned entered an order denying defendant's in forma pauperis motion and allowing defendant thirty days in which to submit the filing fee for the removal of this action. See doc. 5. The undersigned advised defendant that, in the event he failed to pay the filing fee within the time allowed, the undersigned could recommend that the matter be dismissed for failure to comply with an order of the court and/or failure to prosecute. After more than thirty days passed and defendant failed to submit the filing fee, the undersigned entered a order directing defendant to show cause within fourteen days why the matter should not be dismissed for failure to comply with an order of the court and/or failure to prosecute, or remanded to state court. After fourteen days passed and defendant failed to respond, the undersigned entered a Report and Recommendation (doc. 10), recommending that the matter be dismissed without prejudice for plaintiff's failure to prosecute and failure to comply with an order of the court. That Report and Recommendation (doc. 10) was erroneously entered. The undersigned intended to recommend that the matter be remanded to the state court from which it was a removed as a result of defendant's failure to comply with an order of the court and/or failure to prosecute.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED:

1. That the Report and Recommendation entered on December 5, 2014 (doc. 10) be VACATED.

And it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

1. That this case be remanded to the state court from which it was removed as a result of defendant's failure to prosecute and failure to comply with an order of the court.

2. That the Clerk be directed to close the file.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer