Filed: Feb. 23, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 23, 2015
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief District Judge. This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated January 21, 2015. (Doc. 18). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been made. Having considered the Report and Recomme
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief District Judge. This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated January 21, 2015. (Doc. 18). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been made. Having considered the Report and Recommen..
More
ORDER
M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief District Judge.
This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated January 21, 2015. (Doc. 18). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been made.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation and all objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED:
1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation (doc. 18) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.
2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1), challenging the judgment of conviction and sentence in State of Florida v. James Lee Rudolph, Jr., Escambia County, Florida, Circuit Court Case Number 09-CF-4757, is DENIED.
3. The clerk is directed to close the file.
4. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.
DONE AND ORDERED.
