U.S. v. SASSAU, 3:14cr98/MCR. (2015)
Court: District Court, N.D. Florida
Number: infdco20150226910
Visitors: 11
Filed: Feb. 24, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 24, 2015
Summary: AMENDED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY CHARLES J. KAHN, Jr. , Magistrate Judge . The Defendant, by consent, has appeared before me pursuant to Rule 11, Fed. R. Crim. P., and has entered a plea of guilty to Counts Three and Four of the Superseding Indictment. 1 After cautioning and examining the Defendant under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was knowing and voluntary and that the offenses charged are supporte
Summary: AMENDED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY CHARLES J. KAHN, Jr. , Magistrate Judge . The Defendant, by consent, has appeared before me pursuant to Rule 11, Fed. R. Crim. P., and has entered a plea of guilty to Counts Three and Four of the Superseding Indictment. 1 After cautioning and examining the Defendant under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was knowing and voluntary and that the offenses charged are supported..
More
AMENDED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY
CHARLES J. KAHN, Jr., Magistrate Judge.
The Defendant, by consent, has appeared before me pursuant to Rule 11, Fed. R. Crim. P., and has entered a plea of guilty to Counts Three and Four of the Superseding Indictment.1 After cautioning and examining the Defendant under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was knowing and voluntary and that the offenses charged are supported by independent bases in fact containing each of the essential elements thereof. I therefore recommend that the plea of guilty be accepted and that the Defendant be adjudicated guilty and have sentence imposed accordingly.
NOTICE
Any objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed within twenty four (24) hours after being served a copy thereof. Any different deadline that may appear on the electronic docket is for the court's internal use only, and does not control. A copy of objections shall be served upon all other parties. Failure to object may limit the scope of appellate review of factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. § 636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d 698, 701 (11th Cir. 1988).
FootNotes
1. In the original Report and Recommendation, the undersigned erroneously indicated that the defendant pled guilty only to Count three of the Superseding Indictment.
Source: Leagle
