SCOTT v. TUCKER, 1:11-cv-00240-MP-GRJ. (2015)
Court: District Court, N.D. Florida
Number: infdco20150316b32
Visitors: 20
Filed: Mar. 13, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 13, 2015
Summary: ORDER MAURICE M. PAUL , District Judge . This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated February 4, 2015. (Doc. 29). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). The time for filing objections has passed, and none have been filed. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined
Summary: ORDER MAURICE M. PAUL , District Judge . This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated February 4, 2015. (Doc. 29). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). The time for filing objections has passed, and none have been filed. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined ..
More
ORDER
MAURICE M. PAUL, District Judge.
This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated February 4, 2015. (Doc. 29). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). The time for filing objections has passed, and none have been filed.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.
2. The petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, Doc. 1, is denied, and no certificate of appealability is appropriate.
DONE AND ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
