STRANGE v. SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 4:12cv505/RV/GRJ. (2015)
Court: District Court, N.D. Florida
Number: infdco20150702f76
Visitors: 8
Filed: Jun. 30, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 30, 2015
Summary: ORDER ROGER VINSON , Senior District Judge . This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated June 3, 2015. The parties have been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections. Pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), I have made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been made. Having considered the report and recommendation and a
Summary: ORDER ROGER VINSON , Senior District Judge . This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated June 3, 2015. The parties have been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections. Pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), I have made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been made. Having considered the report and recommendation and al..
More
ORDER
ROGER VINSON, Senior District Judge.
This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated June 3, 2015. The parties have been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections. Pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), I have made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been made.
Having considered the report and recommendation and all objections thereto timely filed (doc. 28), I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.
2. The amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus (doc. 10) is DENIED.
3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED and leave to appeal in forma pauperis is DENIED.
DONE AND ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
