CHARLES A. STAMPELOS, Magistrate Judge.
On or about November 25, 2014, Petitioner Terrell Williams, proceeding pro se, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Jacksonville Division. Doc. 1. In his § 2241 petition, Williams, a state prisoner, challenges a federal detainer for a supervised release violation. Id. Because Petitioner was incarcerated at the Franklin Correctional Institution in Carrabelle, Florida, at that time, the Middle District did not have jurisdiction to consider his petition; accordingly, by order dated December 2, 2014, that court transferred the case to this Court for all further proceedings. Docs. 2 and 3.
On April 28, 2015, Respondents filed an answer to the § 2241 petition, with an attached exhibit. Doc. 16. Respondents explain Petitioner claims that his due process rights are being violated by a delay in the resolution of a petition for revocation of supervised release pending in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Jacksonville Division, Case No. 3:05cr100-J-32MCR, and that he is being adversely affected by a detainer lodged against him by the United States Marshals Service as a result of a warrant issued for his arrest to answer the supervised release violation petition. Id. at 1-2. Respondents further explain that this § 2241 petition can be resolved by Williams being transported to Jacksonville to answer the supervised release petition and, on April 22, 2015, the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida issued a writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum, directing the United States Marshals Service to transport Williams to Jacksonville for an initial appearance in the supervised release proceedings on May 20, 2015, in Case No. 3:05cr100-J-32MCR. Id. at 2. Respondents attach, as Exhibit 1, a copy of the April 22, 2015, order. Doc. 16 Attach. 1. Respondents argue that because arrangements have been made for Petitioner to be transported to Jacksonville to answer the supervised release petition, his § 2241 petition is moot and should be denied. Doc. 16 at 3.
Petitioner has not filed a reply, although given an opportunity to do so. See Doc. 14. A review of this case file together with the docket in Case No. 3:05cr100-J-32MCR from the Middle District, reflects that this § 2241 petition should be denied.
In particular, as relief, Petitioner asks this Court to "order that the U.S. Marshals Office withdraw the detainer which is `non-violent,' and order defendant to report to the Office of Pretrial Services upon his release on 12-8-2015 and direct the Pretrial Services along with the Court administrator to set a date for hearing in this cause." Doc. 1 at 8. As Respondent indicates, however, the Middle District has since ordered Petitioner be transported to Jacksonville for the supervised release proceedings. Doc. 16 at 2-3; see
For the reasons set forth above, it is respectfully