U.S. v. EDEKER, 3:04cr106/LAC/EMT (2015)
Court: District Court, N.D. Florida
Number: infdco20151008960
Visitors: 10
Filed: Oct. 07, 2015
Latest Update: Oct. 07, 2015
Summary: ORDER LACEY A. COLLIER , Senior District Judge . This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated August 24, 2015 (doc. 57). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of objections filed. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the timely
Summary: ORDER LACEY A. COLLIER , Senior District Judge . This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated August 24, 2015 (doc. 57). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of objections filed. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the timely f..
More
ORDER
LACEY A. COLLIER, Senior District Judge.
This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated August 24, 2015 (doc. 57). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of objections filed.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the timely filed objections thereto, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1. The chief magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.
2. Defendant's motion to vacate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (doc. 56), is SUMMARILY DISMISSED, as this court lacks jurisdiction to consider a successive motion absent authorization from the Eleventh Circuit.
3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.
DONE AND ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
