Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. CHAPA, 13-80149-Cr-Hurley. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. Florida Number: infdco20151020844 Visitors: 16
Filed: Sep. 23, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 23, 2015
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and DETENTION ORDER JAMES M. HOPKINS , Magistrate Judge . THIS CAUSE is before the Court for a final probable cause hearing on a petition for violation of supervised release, and for consideration of the issue of detention pursuant to Rule 32.1(a)(6) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and 18 U.S.C. 3143(a). The Defendant appeared before the Court on September 21, 2015. The Defendant is charged with being unsuccessfully discharged from Jerome Golden Cente
More

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and DETENTION ORDER

THIS CAUSE is before the Court for a final probable cause hearing on a petition for violation of supervised release, and for consideration of the issue of detention pursuant to Rule 32.1(a)(6) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a). The Defendant appeared before the Court on September 21, 2015. The Defendant is charged with being unsuccessfully discharged from Jerome Golden Center for Behavioral Health's Concurring Disorders Residential Treatment program. The defendant admitted to the violation.

The Court finds that the Defendant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily admits to violating his supervised release and would like to proceed to sentencing. The Court also finds that the Defendant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waives his rights to a final probable cause hearing.

The Court RECOMMENDS that the District Court accept the Defendant's admission and find the Defendant guilty.

A party shall serve and file written objections, if any, to this Report and Recommendation with the Honorable United States District Court Judge Kenneth A. Marra within fourteen days of being served with a copy of this Report and Recommendation. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Failure to file timely objections may limit the scope of appellate review of factual findings contained herein. See United States v. Warren, 687 F.2d 347, 348 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1087 (1983).

DETENTION

The Rules of Criminal Procedure provide that a magistrate judge may release or detain a person charged with violating supervised release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a). See United States v. Loya, 23 F.3d 1529 (9th Cir. 1994); Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.1(a)(6), 46(c). Both Rules 32.1(a)(6) and 46(c) provide that the Defendant bears the burden of establishing that he or she will not flee or pose a danger to any other person or to the community. Moreover, the Court is required to detain the defendant unless the Court finds by clear and convincing evidence that the Defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to the safety of any other person or the community if released. See 18 U.S.C. §§3142(e-f), 3143(a), and 3148(a-b).

Based upon the nature of the violation, in that it not only involves the Defendant being terminated from a halfway house for rule infractions, but also that Defendant failed to report to Probation thereafter; the Defendants' history of threats against the President, mental illness, addiction, and prior violation of supervised release, the Court finds that the Defendant has failed to prove, by clear and convincing evidence, that he does not pose a danger to the safety of any other person or the community, and a serious risk of flight, if released.

Under such circumstances, and in light of the dictates of 18 U.S.C. § 3143, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that the Defendant, RAYMOND L. CHAPA, be detained until further order of the Court.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendant be remanded to the custody of the U.S. Marshals until further proceedings occur. The Court also directs that the Defendant be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with counsel, and the Court directs that, on order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the Government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which the Defendant is confined deliver the Defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding.

DONE and SUBMITTED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer