Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

SPAULDING v. WOODALL, 4:11-cv-00605-MP-CAS. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. Florida Number: infdco20151029d34 Visitors: 7
Filed: Oct. 28, 2015
Latest Update: Oct. 28, 2015
Summary: ORDER MAURICE M. PAUL , District Judge . This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated September 16, 2015. (Doc. 212). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). Plaintiff has filed objections at Doc. 219. I have made a de novo review based on those objections. Having considered the Report an
More

ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated September 16, 2015. (Doc. 212). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). Plaintiff has filed objections at Doc. 219. I have made a de novo review based on those objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the timely filed objections, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 212) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Plaintiff's motion for leave to file an eighth amended complaint is DENIED.

3. This case is remanded to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.

DONE AND ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer