Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. SMITH, 06-80172-CR-RYSKAMP. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. Florida Number: infdco20151117964 Visitors: 6
Filed: Oct. 26, 2015
Latest Update: Oct. 26, 2015
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION JAMES M. HOPKINS , Magistrate Judge . THIS CAUSE is before the Court for a final probable cause hearing on a superseding petition for violations of supervised release. The Defendant, KARLTON SMITH, appeared before the Court on October 15, 2015. The Defendant was charged with 3 violations of law for the on or about August 6, 2014 crimes of aggravated assault on a police officer, possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, and discharging a firearm in public. The
More

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS CAUSE is before the Court for a final probable cause hearing on a superseding petition for violations of supervised release. The Defendant, KARLTON SMITH, appeared before the Court on October 15, 2015. The Defendant was charged with 3 violations of law for the on or about August 6, 2014 crimes of aggravated assault on a police officer, possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, and discharging a firearm in public.

The Government moved to dismiss the violations due to insufficient evidence for the following reasons: another individual was initially arrested for the crimes based upon a confession, a video of the Defendant at the scene does not show him clearly to be in possession of a firearm and he is wearing a white shirt (not a black shirt as described by the on scene officer), and only the fingerprints of a third person were found on the gun.

Accordingly, this Court RECOMMENDS that based upon the above that the District Court DISMISS the petition.

A party shall serve and file written objections, if any, to this Report and Recommendation with the Honorable Senior United States District Court Judge Kenneth L. Ryskamp, within fourteen days of being served with a copy of this Report and Recommendation. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Failure to file timely objections may limit the scope of appellate review of factual findings contained herein. See United States v. Warren, 687 F.2d 347, 348 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1087 (1983).

DONE and SUBMITTED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer