Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. CERANO, 3:09cr28/MCR (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. Florida Number: infdco20160202b99 Visitors: 9
Filed: Feb. 01, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 01, 2016
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS , Chief District Judge . This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated August 5, 2015. ECF No. 237. Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objec
More

ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated August 5, 2015. ECF No. 237. Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.

2. The amended motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence, ECF No. 220, is DENIED.

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Defendant's last name is spelled "Cerano" in all court documents except the amended motion to vacate, which the court assumes is a scrivener's error.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer