U.S. v. Cusumano, 1:14cr1-MW/GRJ. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. Florida
Number: infdco20160223936
Visitors: 4
Filed: Feb. 22, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2016
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION MARK E. WALKER , District Judge . This Court considered at sentencing hearing on February 22, 2016, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, ECF No.97, and considered Plaintiff's ore tenus objections to the report and recommendation made at the sentencing hearing. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted, over Defendant's oral objections at hearing, as this Court's opinion. This Court calculat
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION MARK E. WALKER , District Judge . This Court considered at sentencing hearing on February 22, 2016, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, ECF No.97, and considered Plaintiff's ore tenus objections to the report and recommendation made at the sentencing hearing. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted, over Defendant's oral objections at hearing, as this Court's opinion. This Court calculate..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
MARK E. WALKER, District Judge.
This Court considered at sentencing hearing on February 22, 2016, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, ECF No.97, and considered Plaintiff's ore tenus objections to the report and recommendation made at the sentencing hearing. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted, over Defendant's oral objections at hearing, as this Court's opinion. This Court calculates Defendant's guideline sentence under § 2B1.1(b)(1) of the U.S.S.G. based upon a loss attributable to Defendant in the sum of $8,165,996.40. Further, Defendant is ORDERED to pay restitution to the SHCU investors identified in Government Exhibit No. 4 of the December 8, 2015, restitution hearing before The Hon. Gary R. Jones, in the total sum of $7,836,483.74, which sum represents the actual losses incurred by the SHCU investors. These findings were made on the record at sentencing on February 22, 2016.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
