Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Gutierrez, 05-20859-CR-HUCK-OTAZO-REYES. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. Florida Number: infdco20160316969 Visitors: 13
Filed: Mar. 15, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 15, 2016
Summary: AGREED ORDER ADOPTING IN PART, AND OVERRULING IN PART, PART V OF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION PAUL C. HUCK , District Judge . THIS MATTER came for hearing on February 29, 2016, on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 1137] (the "R&R") regarding the Government Parties' Motion in Limine ("Motion") [ECF No. 1073] to exclude the testimony of Professor Keith Rosenn ("Rosenn Declaration") [ECF No. 1059-1] as set forth in Part V of the R&R. The Government Parties filed Joint O
More

AGREED ORDER ADOPTING IN PART, AND OVERRULING IN PART, PART V OF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS MATTER came for hearing on February 29, 2016, on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 1137] (the "R&R") regarding the Government Parties' Motion in Limine ("Motion") [ECF No. 1073] to exclude the testimony of Professor Keith Rosenn ("Rosenn Declaration") [ECF No. 1059-1] as set forth in Part V of the R&R. The Government Parties filed Joint Objections to the R&R ("Objections") [ECF No. 1144]. This Court having reviewed de novo the Motion, the Rosenn Declaration, the Objections, and Response to Objections [ECF No. 1148], the record, heard argument of counsel, and having been duly advised, with due notice having been given, it is hereby

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that:

For all the reasons stated on the record, Part V of the R&R is ADOPTED, in part, and OVERRULED, in part, and only such portions of the Rosenn Declaration, as set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto, and testimony consistent with the statements in Exhibit A, will be considered in this proceeding. All other testimony of Professor Rosenn is hereby excluded.

DONE and ORDERED

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer