SUSSMAN v. METCALF, 4:14cv619-RH/CAS. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. Florida
Number: infdco20160329917
Visitors: 9
Filed: Mar. 28, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2016
Summary: ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ROBERT L. HINKLE , District Judge . This case is before the court on the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, ECF No. 62, and the objections, ECF No. 63. I have reviewed de novo the issues raised by the objections. Upon consideration, IT IS ORDERED: The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the court's opinion. The motion to dismiss, ECF No. 52 is granted in part and denied in part, as set out in the report and recommendation. I
Summary: ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ROBERT L. HINKLE , District Judge . This case is before the court on the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, ECF No. 62, and the objections, ECF No. 63. I have reviewed de novo the issues raised by the objections. Upon consideration, IT IS ORDERED: The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the court's opinion. The motion to dismiss, ECF No. 52 is granted in part and denied in part, as set out in the report and recommendation. I d..
More
ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
ROBERT L. HINKLE, District Judge.
This case is before the court on the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, ECF No. 62, and the objections, ECF No. 63. I have reviewed de novo the issues raised by the objections. Upon consideration,
IT IS ORDERED:
The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the court's opinion. The motion to dismiss, ECF No. 52 is granted in part and denied in part, as set out in the report and recommendation. I do not direct the entry of judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). The case is remanded to the magistrate judge for further proceedings.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
