U.S. v. BRIGHT, 5:04cr34/MCR/EMT (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. Florida
Number: infdco20160420f03
Visitors: 14
Filed: Apr. 18, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 18, 2016
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS , Chief District Judge . This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated March 15, 2016. ECF No. 99. The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS , Chief District Judge . This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated March 15, 2016. ECF No. 99. The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and a..
More
ORDER
M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief District Judge.
This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated March 15, 2016. ECF No. 99. The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1. The chief magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.
2. The motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence, ECF No. 98, is summarily DENIED and DISMISSED.
3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.
DONE AND ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
