Filed: Oct. 21, 2016
Latest Update: Oct. 21, 2016
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS , Chief District Judge . This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated September 21, 2016. (ECF No. 634). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendatio
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS , Chief District Judge . This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated September 21, 2016. (ECF No. 634). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation..
More
ORDER
M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief District Judge.
This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated September 21, 2016. (ECF No. 634). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1. The chief magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.
2. The district court makes the following findings:
(a) William L. Amos waived his right to have a hearing on the matter of the "head of household exemption" by failing to timely file a notice requesting such and by failing to timely show cause why the exemption should not be denied on grounds of the written guaranty. (See ECF Nos. 529, 530, 549).
(b) William L. Amos expressly consented to a garnishment of his earnings by the plain language of the Continuing Guaranty signed by Amos and attached to the Verified Answer submitted by FDIC-R. (ECF No. 530).
3. The memorandum in support of the motion to dissolve the writs of garnishment served upon UBS Bank and UBS Financial Services, Inc. (ECF No. 584), filed by William L. Amos, are STRICKEN from the record, as filed in violation of Local Rules 7.1(E) and 7.1(I) of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida.
DONE and ORDERED.
