ORDER and REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CHARLES A. STAMPELOS, Magistrate Judge.

On October 3, 2017, the pro se Petitioner initiated this case by filing a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. ECF No. 1. Petitioner is a native and citizen of Cuba who was ordered removed from the United States on December 15, 2016. Id. Petitioner was taken into ICE custody on March 22, 2017, and alleges in the petition that "ICE has been unable to remove [him] to Cuba or any other country." Id. Petitioner says the Cuban Embassy has "failed to issue travel documents," resulting in his prolonged detention. Id. Petitioner seeks release from detention pursuant to Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001).

Finding the petition sufficient, service was directed and Respondents required to show good cause why the petition should not be granted. ECF No. 4. Respondents have now filed a motion to dismiss, ECF No. 10, asserting that the petition is moot because Petitioner was released under an order of supervision. Attached to the motion is an exhibit revealing that Petitioner was released from detention on November 13, 2017. ECF No. 10-1. Therefore, because Petitioner has been afforded the relief sought, release from detention, this § 2241 petition should now be dismissed as moot.

Additionally, the motion to dismiss contains a certificate of service which indicates the document was provided to Petitioner at "his address of release, 161 Crown Drive, Naples, Florida 34110." ECF No. 10 at 4; see also ECF No. 10-1 at 3. The Clerk of Court shall forward this Report and Recommendation to Petitioner at that address. If Petitioner disputes that this case is moot, he must immediately file "objections" and a notice of change of address.

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall forward this Report and Recommendation to Petitioner at 161 Crown Drive, Naples, Florida 34110, and his address of record at the Wakulla County Jail.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

In light of Respondents' demonstration that Petitioner has been released, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED that the § 2241 petition be DISMISSED as moot since Petitioner has been granted the relief sought in the petition.

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of this Report and Recommendation, a party may serve and file specific written objections to these proposed findings and recommendations. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). A copy of the objections shall be served upon all other parties. A party may respond to another party's objections within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy thereof. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). Any different deadline that may appear on the electronic docket is for the Court's internal use only and does not control. If a party fails to object to the Magistrate Judge's findings or recommendations as to any particular claim or issue contained in this Report and Recommendation, that party waives the right to challenge on appeal the District Court's order based on the unobjected-to factual and legal conclusions. See 11th Cir. Rule 3-1; 28 U.S.C. § 636.