Filed: Jan. 25, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 25, 2018
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS , Chief District Judge . This case is before the Court on consideration of the Chief Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated November 27, 2017 (ECF No. 43). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No timely objection has been filed. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the record, the Court f
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS , Chief District Judge . This case is before the Court on consideration of the Chief Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated November 27, 2017 (ECF No. 43). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No timely objection has been filed. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the record, the Court fi..
More
ORDER
M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief District Judge.
This case is before the Court on consideration of the Chief Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated November 27, 2017 (ECF No. 43). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No timely objection has been filed.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the record, the Court finds that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1. The Chief Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.
2. Defendant Taylor's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 40) is GRANTED.
3. Defendant Lane's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 32) is GRANTED as to Plaintiff's retaliation claim, but DENIED as to Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim and Plaintiff's request for compensatory and punitive damages.
4. This matter is recommitted to the assigned magistrate judge for further proceedings on Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claims against Defendant Lane and Defendant "Officer Carter."
DONE AND ORDERED.
