U.S. v. Valentine, 3:03cr134/RV/CJK (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. Florida
Number: infdco20180215b23
Visitors: 7
Filed: Feb. 13, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 13, 2018
Summary: ORDER ROGER VINSON , Senior District Judge . This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated January 30, 2018 (doc. 87). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the objectio
Summary: ORDER ROGER VINSON , Senior District Judge . This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated January 30, 2018 (doc. 87). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the objection..
More
ORDER
ROGER VINSON, Senior District Judge.
This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated January 30, 2018 (doc. 87). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the objections thereto timely filed (doc. 88), I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.
2. Defendant's motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence by a person in federal custody (ECF No. 86) is summarily DENIED and DISMISSED as untimely.
3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.
DONE AND ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
