Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Ali v. Florida, 3:16cv88-MCR/CAS. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. Florida Number: infdco20180529908 Visitors: 12
Filed: May 25, 2018
Latest Update: May 25, 2018
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS , Chief District Judge . This cause comes on for consideration on the Report and Recommendation of the magistrate judge dated October 27, 2017. ECF No. 38. The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto time
More

ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration on the Report and Recommendation of the magistrate judge dated October 27, 2017. ECF No. 38. The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 38, is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.

2. The amended petition for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, ECF No. 14, is DENIED.

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases in the U.S. District Courts.

DOEN AND ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer