Franklin v. Peterson, 4:16cv470-MW/CAS. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. Florida
Number: infdco20180608c15
Visitors: 7
Filed: Jun. 07, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 07, 2018
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION MARK E. WALKER , District Judge . This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. ECF No. 42. Upon consideration, no objections having been filed by the parties, IT IS ORDERED: The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted as this Court's opinion. Plaintiff's motion for leave to file an amended complaint, ECF No. 40, is DENIED because the proposed fourth amended complaint, EC
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION MARK E. WALKER , District Judge . This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. ECF No. 42. Upon consideration, no objections having been filed by the parties, IT IS ORDERED: The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted as this Court's opinion. Plaintiff's motion for leave to file an amended complaint, ECF No. 40, is DENIED because the proposed fourth amended complaint, ECF..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
MARK E. WALKER, District Judge.
This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. ECF No. 42. Upon consideration, no objections having been filed by the parties,
IT IS ORDERED:
The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted as this Court's opinion. Plaintiff's motion for leave to file an amended complaint, ECF No. 40, is DENIED because the proposed fourth amended complaint, ECF No. 40-1, fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. This case is REMANDED to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
