Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Kozlowska, 1:18-cr-9-MW-GRJ. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. Florida Number: infdco20180615b72 Visitors: 8
Filed: Jun. 13, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 13, 2018
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION GARY R. JONES , Magistrate Judge . On this date, the Defendant, MARTA KOZLOWSKA, her attorney, and the attorney for the Government 1 appeared before the undersigned for the purpose of considering Defendant's entry of a guilty plea to transportation of more than $5,000 in stolen goods, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 2314 and 2, as charged in Count One of the Indictment. The district judge referred this matter to the undersigned for purposes of hearing Defendant's pr
More

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On this date, the Defendant, MARTA KOZLOWSKA, her attorney, and the attorney for the Government1 appeared before the undersigned for the purpose of considering Defendant's entry of a guilty plea to transportation of more than $5,000 in stolen goods, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2314 and 2, as charged in Count One of the Indictment. The district judge referred this matter to the undersigned for purposes of hearing Defendant's proposed plea pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 11, and to enter a report and recommendation as to whether to accept the plea. All parties consented to this procedure, and the written consent has been entered.

The Court addressed Defendant personally in open court, and after assuring that Defendant was competent to proceed and had consented to pleading guilty, the Court finds:

1. Defendant is mentally alert, appears to be reasonably intelligent, and understands the nature of the charges as to which the plea is offered and the consequences of a guilty plea.

2. Defendant understands that she has a right to trial by jury, to persist in her plea of not guilty, to assistance of counsel at trial, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and that she has a right against compelled self-incrimination.

3. Defendant understands the maximum possible sentence she faces if the guilty plea is accepted, including the effect of the supervised release term, and understands that the sentencing guidelines apply and that the court may depart from those guidelines under some circumstances.

4. The plea of guilty by the Defendant has been freely, knowingly, and voluntarily made and is not the result of force or threats or of any promises except for those promises contained in the written plea agreement between the parties.

5. Defendant is competent to plead guilty.

6. Defendant understands that her answers during the plea colloquy, which were under oath, may be later used against her in a prosecution for perjury or false statement.

7. There is a factual basis for Defendant's guilty plea.

8. There is a plea agreement which should be accepted by the district court. Defendant understands the terms of the plea agreement.

9. Defendant has made her decision to plead guilty with the advice and counsel of a competent attorney with whom Defendant acknowledged she was satisfied.

10. Defendant has voluntarily consented to go forward with her plea of guilty before the undersigned. She understands that she has waived the ten-day period for filing objections to this report and recommendation, and she agrees that she has twenty-four hours from receipt of a copy of this report and recommendation in which to file written objections, if any. The United States also consents to this procedure, including the shorter period for objections.

Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED that the Court ACCEPT the plea agreement and Defendant's plea of guilty.

FootNotes


1. The Court and the parties also had the benefit of a certified Polish interpreter to translate the proceedings for the Defendant.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer