Filed: Jun. 25, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 25, 2018
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS , District Judge . This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated April 30, 2018. ECF No. 24. The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any ob
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS , District Judge . This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated April 30, 2018. ECF No. 24. The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any obj..
More
ORDER
M. CASEY RODGERS, District Judge.
This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated April 30, 2018. ECF No. 24. The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1. The chief magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.
2. Respondent's motion to dismiss, ECF No. 21, is GRANTED.
3. The habeas petition, ECF No. 1, is DISMISSED as untimely.
4. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.
