U.S. v. Hirmer, 3:08cr79-MCR/CJK (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. Florida
Number: infdco20180830c00
Visitors: 7
Filed: Aug. 29, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 29, 2018
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS , District Judge . This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated June 13, 2018. ECF No. 1941. Defendant has been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS , District Judge . This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated June 13, 2018. ECF No. 1941. Defendant has been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections t..
More
ORDER
M. CASEY RODGERS, District Judge.
This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated June 13, 2018. ECF No. 1941. Defendant has been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.
2. Defendant Claudia Hirmer's Motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence, ECF No. 1834, is DENIED.
3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.
DONE AND ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
