U.S. v. Shoemaker, 3:13cr26-MCR. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. Florida
Number: infdco20180830c01
Visitors: 19
Filed: Aug. 29, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 29, 2018
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS , District Judge . This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated June 20, 2018. ECF No. 68. The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objection
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS , District Judge . This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated June 20, 2018. ECF No. 68. The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections..
More
ORDER
M. CASEY RODGERS, District Judge.
This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated June 20, 2018. ECF No. 68. The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.
2. Defendant's objection to the writ of execution. ECF No. 53, is DENIED. The government is permitted to garnish defendant's IRA. The government is responsible for evaluating the restitution amounts paid by the defendants in N.D. Fla. Case No. 3:16cr96-RV and ensuring the amount of restitution collected from Mr. Shoemaker does not exceed the amount owed.
DONE AND ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
