Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Hendricks v. Uhlfelder, 3:17cv307-MCR-CJK. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. Florida Number: infdco20180921b33 Visitors: 10
Filed: Sep. 20, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 20, 2018
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS , District Judge . This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated August 27, 2018. ECF No. 43. The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objecti
More

ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated August 27, 2018. ECF No. 43. The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.

2. Defendant Daniel W. Uhlfelder and Daniel W. Uhlfelder, P.A.'s Motion to Dismiss and for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 38, is GRANTED and Plaintiff's claims against them are DISMISSED with PREJUDICE.

3. Defendants Cynthia S. Tunnicliff and Pennington, P.A.'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, ECF No. 39, is GRANTED and Plaintiff's claims against them are DISMISSED with PREJUDICE.

4. The clerk shall close the file.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer