Jackson v. Coppenger, 3:16cv644-MCR-CJK. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. Florida
Number: infdco20181002h88
Visitors: 8
Filed: Sep. 28, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 28, 2018
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS , District Judge . This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated August 31, 2018. ECF No. 51. The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objecti
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS , District Judge . This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated August 31, 2018. ECF No. 51. The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objectio..
More
ORDER
M. CASEY RODGERS, District Judge.
This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated August 31, 2018. ECF No. 51. The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.
2. Defendants' motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 49, is DENIED.
3. This matter is referred to the assigned Magistrate Judge for further pretrial proceedings on Plaintiff's individual capacity Eighth Amendment claim against Defendants Coppenger and Shaw.
DONE AND ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
