Filed: Dec. 28, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 28, 2018
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS BETH BLOOM , District Judge . THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Amended Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2241, ECF No. [12] ("Petition"), filed on October 12, 2018. This case was previously referred to the Honorable Patrick A. White for a Report and Recommendations ("R&R") on all dispositive matters. See ECF No. [2]. On December 13, 2018, Judge White issued a R&R recommending that this case be dismi
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS BETH BLOOM , District Judge . THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Amended Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2241, ECF No. [12] ("Petition"), filed on October 12, 2018. This case was previously referred to the Honorable Patrick A. White for a Report and Recommendations ("R&R") on all dispositive matters. See ECF No. [2]. On December 13, 2018, Judge White issued a R&R recommending that this case be dismis..
More
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
BETH BLOOM, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Amended Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, ECF No. [12] ("Petition"), filed on October 12, 2018. This case was previously referred to the Honorable Patrick A. White for a Report and Recommendations ("R&R") on all dispositive matters. See ECF No. [2]. On December 13, 2018, Judge White issued a R&R recommending that this case be dismissed without prejudice for Petitioner's failure to prosecute and comply with Court orders. ECF No. [20]. The R&R also stated that Petitioner could file any objections within fourteen days of receipt of a copy of the R&R, or submit a properly amended complaint, in accordance with the Rules, which cures the deficiencies noted in this Report and in prior orders, within fourteen days of receipt of a copy of this Report. Id. To date, Petitioner has done neither, nor has she sought additional time in which to do so.
The Court has conducted a de novo review of Judge White's R&R, the record, and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. Williams v. McNeil, 557 F.3d 1287, 1291 (11th Cir. 2009) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)). Upon review, the Court finds Judge White's R&R to be well reasoned and correct. The Court therefore agrees with the analysis in Judge White's R&R and concludes that this case should be dismissed for the reasons set forth therein.
For the foregoing reasons, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:
1. Magistrate Judge White's R&R, ECF No. [20], is ADOPTED;
2. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE;
3. All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT; and,
4. The Clerk shall CLOSE this case.
DONE AND ORDERED.