Warren Technology, Inc. v. UL LLC, 18-21019-CIV-UNGARO/O'SULLIVAN. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. Florida
Number: infdco20190122c36
Visitors: 16
Filed: Jan. 18, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 18, 2019
Summary: ORDER JOHN J. O'SULLIVAN , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Defendant Tutco LLC's Verified Motion for Attorney's Fees (DE # 65, 12/27/18). Having reviewed the applicable filings and law, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Defendant Tutco LLC's Verified Motion for Attorney's Fees (DE # 65, 12/27/18) is DENIED without prejudice to renew after the exhaustion of all appeals. The defendant requests attorney's fees under the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practice
Summary: ORDER JOHN J. O'SULLIVAN , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Defendant Tutco LLC's Verified Motion for Attorney's Fees (DE # 65, 12/27/18). Having reviewed the applicable filings and law, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Defendant Tutco LLC's Verified Motion for Attorney's Fees (DE # 65, 12/27/18) is DENIED without prejudice to renew after the exhaustion of all appeals. The defendant requests attorney's fees under the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices..
More
ORDER
JOHN J. O'SULLIVAN, Magistrate Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Defendant Tutco LLC's Verified Motion for Attorney's Fees (DE # 65, 12/27/18). Having reviewed the applicable filings and law, it is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Defendant Tutco LLC's Verified Motion for Attorney's Fees (DE # 65, 12/27/18) is DENIED without prejudice to renew after the exhaustion of all appeals.
The defendant requests attorney's fees under the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act (FDUTPA). "[T]o recover attorney's fees in a FDUTPA action, a party must prevail in the litigation; meaning that the party must receive a favorable judgment from a trial court with regard to the legal action, including the exhaustion of all appeals." Chow v. Chak Yam Chau, 640 Fed. Appx. 834, 838 (11th Cir. 2015) (quoting Diamond Aircraft Indus., Inc. V. Horowitch, 107 So.3d 362, 367 (Fla. 2013)).
DONE AND ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
