Filed: Feb. 15, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 15, 2019
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS , District Judge . This cause is before the Court on consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated September 24, 2018. ECF No. 17. The parties have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). The Court has made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, the Court has determ
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS , District Judge . This cause is before the Court on consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated September 24, 2018. ECF No. 17. The parties have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). The Court has made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, the Court has determi..
More
ORDER
M. CASEY RODGERS, District Judge.
This cause is before the Court on consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated September 24, 2018. ECF No. 17. The parties have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). The Court has made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, the Court has determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 17, is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.
2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus, ECF No. 1, is DENIED.
3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.
4. The Clerk is directed to close the file.
DONE AND ORDERED.
