Gatewood v. Unlimited Path, Inc., 5:18cv66-MCR-GRJ. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. Florida
Number: infdco20190226a73
Visitors: 11
Filed: Feb. 25, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 25, 2019
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS , District Judge . This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated January 17, 2019. The parties have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendat
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS , District Judge . This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated January 17, 2019. The parties have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendati..
More
ORDER
M. CASEY RODGERS, District Judge.
This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated January 17, 2019. The parties have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.
2. The motion to dismiss, ECF No. 12, is DENIED.
3. Plaintiff is permitted to proceed with her ADA claim.
Source: Leagle
