Filed: Mar. 12, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 12, 2019
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION MARK E. WALKER , Chief District Judge . This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 29, and has also reviewed de novo Plaintiff's objections to the report and recommendation. ECF No. 33. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted, over the objections of Plaintiff, as this Court's opinion. The motion to dismiss, ECF no. 17, is GRANTE
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION MARK E. WALKER , Chief District Judge . This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 29, and has also reviewed de novo Plaintiff's objections to the report and recommendation. ECF No. 33. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted, over the objections of Plaintiff, as this Court's opinion. The motion to dismiss, ECF no. 17, is GRANTED..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
MARK E. WALKER, Chief District Judge.
This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 29, and has also reviewed de novo Plaintiff's objections to the report and recommendation. ECF No. 33. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted, over the objections of Plaintiff, as this Court's opinion. The motion to dismiss, ECF no. 17, is GRANTED as to the Palazesi defendants. Count II of Plaintiff's second amended complaint, ECF No. 14, is DISMISSED because Plaintiff has failed to exhaust administrative remedies as required, because Plaintiff is not authorized to bring pro se claims under the ADA or § 504 of the Rehabilitation Act on behalf of another person, and because the allegations are insufficient to state a claim for relief. To the extent L.R. asserts she brings Count II on her own behalf, she needs to seek to amend her complaint. This case is REMANDED to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings on the surviving claims brought against the Leon County School Board and for consideration of a motion to amend, if any.
SO ORDERED.
