U.S. v. Waters, 3:08cr116/MCR/HTC (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. Florida
Number: infdco20190610626
Visitors: 2
Filed: Jun. 03, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 03, 2019
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS , District Judge . This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated March 26, 2019. ECF No. 135. The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objecti
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS , District Judge . This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated March 26, 2019. ECF No. 135. The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objectio..
More
ORDER
M. CASEY RODGERS, District Judge.
This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated March 26, 2019. ECF No. 135. The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.
2. The motion to correct sentence, ECF No. 106, is DENIED.
3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
