Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Godowski v. City of Pensacola, 3:16cv354-RV-HTC. (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. Florida Number: infdco20190730b81 Visitors: 4
Filed: Jul. 29, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 29, 2019
Summary: ORDER ROGER VINSON , Senior District Judge . This cause comes for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (R&R) dated July 12, 2019. (Doc. 57). The parties have been furnished a copy of the R&R and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). The defendant has filed an objection, and I have made a de novo determination of that objection. Having considered the R&R, and the defendant's objecti
More

ORDER

This cause comes for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (R&R) dated July 12, 2019. (Doc. 57). The parties have been furnished a copy of the R&R and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). The defendant has filed an objection, and I have made a de novo determination of that objection.

Having considered the R&R, and the defendant's objection thereto, I have determined that the R&R should be adopted, with the caveat (as noted in the defendant's objection) that the three references in the R&R to the "City Attorney" should instead read "Assistant State Attorney."

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The Magistrate Judge's R&R is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order, subject to the foregoing correction.

2. Defendant City of Pensacola's Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 54) is GRANTED.

3. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Bradley Craig are DISMISSED.

4. The clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer