Adderly v. Johnson, 5:18cv220-TKW-MJF. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. Florida
Number: infdco20190826827
Visitors: 13
Filed: Aug. 23, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 23, 2019
Summary: ORDER T. KENT WETHERELL, II , District Judge . This case is before the Court based upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc.41). No objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed. Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, I find no clear error in the magistrate judge's determination that Plaintiff is not entitled to a judgment by default. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that: 1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and incorporated by r
Summary: ORDER T. KENT WETHERELL, II , District Judge . This case is before the Court based upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc.41). No objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed. Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, I find no clear error in the magistrate judge's determination that Plaintiff is not entitled to a judgment by default. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that: 1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and incorporated by re..
More
ORDER
T. KENT WETHERELL, II, District Judge.
This case is before the Court based upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc.41). No objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed. Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, I find no clear error in the magistrate judge's determination that Plaintiff is not entitled to a judgment by default. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:
1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this Order.
2. Plaintiff's motion for judgment by default (Doc. 38) is DENIED.
DONE and ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
