Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Montgomery v. Inch, 3:16cv225-RV-HTC. (2020)

Court: District Court, N.D. Florida Number: infdco20200214c24 Visitors: 12
Filed: Feb. 12, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 12, 2020
Summary: ORDER ROGER VINSON , Senior District Judge . This case is before the Court based on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 50), to which the Petitioner has objected (ECF Doc 51). Having considered the Report and Recommendation and conducted a de novo review of the objected to portions thereof, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that: 1. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 50) is adopted
More

ORDER

This case is before the Court based on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 50), to which the Petitioner has objected (ECF Doc 51). Having considered the Report and Recommendation and conducted a de novo review of the objected to portions thereof, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that:

1. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 50) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order. 2. The amended petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (ECF Doc. 20) is DENIED. 3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. 4. The clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer